Showing posts with label Ministry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ministry. Show all posts

Monday, June 10, 2019

Homily for Monday, 10 June 2019– Memorial of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of the Church

Readings of the day: Acts 1:12-14; Psalm 87:1-2, 3, 5, 6-7; John 19:25-34

Monday of the 10th week in Ordinary Time

What is the most important ministry in the Church?

My doctoral research in Paris is focused primarily on the development of ordained priestly ministry and how the Church expresses and understands the ministry of priests through its ordination rituals since Vatican II. Yet I am fascinated by the diversity of officially-recognized ministry, of both women and men, dating back to the earliest days of the Church. Very early in the Church, there were not only bishops, elders (or presbyters, the forerunners of today’s priests), and deacons, but women and men consecrated to focus their lives on particular forms of service for the good of the Church and the world. And then there were orders of virgins and widows, the minor orders (which persisted until after Vatican II) of porter, lector, acolyte, and exorcist, all with official rituals to install people into those ministries.

But do any of us notice that, in all this diversity of ministries, there is not and has never been a ministry of mothers officially recognized or marked by a formal ritual in the Church? This, I think, is why our Church’s veneration of Mary, mother of Jesus, under many titles, devotions, and feast days, is so significant. Not only is Mary celebrated as “Mother of God,” particularly on the first day of each calendar year, January 1, but since just last year Mary has been celebrated throughout the whole Catholic Church as “Mother of the Church” on this, the first Monday after Pentecost.

The Church herself is often called “Mother Church.” But what aspects of motherhood—the motherhood of Mary, the motherhood of the Church, the motherhood of mothers among the Church’s faithful—do we celebrate with this feast of Mary, Mother of the Church? How do these aspects of motherhood we celebrate on this day apply not only to Mary, but to each of us, whether we are actual mothers or not?

The portrayal of Mary, mother of Jesus and mother of the Church, “standing by the cross” in John’s Gospel from which we hear today, coupled with the specific mention in the Acts of the Apostles of Mary’s presence among the apostles and disciples of Jesus in “the upper room” in Jerusalem after Jesus’ ascension to heaven, stand out to me.

In both places, Mary shows motherhood to be a ministry of “standing with”; of praying with; of solidarity and empathy with those who are joyful; those who are waiting with hope; those who are suffering. This is a ministry to which each of us is called, sisters and brothers, whether or not we are actual mothers.

The motherhood of Mary, mother of the Church; the motherhood of the Church itself; the “motherly” ministry of each member of the Church’s baptized faithful, is a ministry that intentionally seeks out somebody to stand with and pray with and for, as Mary did beneath the cross and then in the upper room. Does each of us know somebody who is suffering in any way? Do we know people whose faith needs strengthening? Do we know anybody who is joyfully and energetically doing great work to better the Church or the world, who could benefit from our prayer and more vocal and deliberate recognition?

These are a few ways in which we could and maybe already do exercise our motherly ministry as Church. These are but a few ways in which we might emulate Mary, Mother of the Church, ways in which we stand and pray with one another, in times of joy as in the upper room and in times of sorrow as at the foot of the cross. Mary, Mother of the Church, pray for us.

Thursday, August 23, 2018

Homily for Friday, 24 August 2018‒ Feast of St. Bartholomew

Friday of the 20th Week in Ordinary Time

Readings of the day: Revelation 21:9b-14; Psalm 145:10-11, 12-13, 17-18; John 1:45-51

This homily was given at St. James Church, Vernon, BC, Canada.

What is the difference between a disciple and an apostle, and how are these related to each other? Please forgive me for a somewhat academic beginning to my reflection here but, for most of the year, I live in Paris as a doctoral student and, when I am not in Paris, I teach theology courses at St. Joseph’s College at the University of Alberta in Edmonton.

A disciple, from the Greek origin of this word, is a student. We might think of related words like “discipline,” which can mean either the necessary focus on a specific area of study, or the area of study itself. The simplest, most literal meaning of an apostle, again a word of Greek origin, is one who is sent out.

I like to think of my experience as a priest; in ministry; as a Christian as one of combining roles as a disciple and an apostle, a student drawn in to learn from experts and then one who is sent out to serve, to teach, and to draw other people to Jesus Christ. We hear today from John’s Gospel about the encounters between Philip and Nathanael and then Nathanael and Jesus, how Philip and Nathanael combine roles as disciples and apostles.

John introduces Philip to us as a newly-called disciple. He is Jesus’ newest student, and he is a straight-A student! Philip is quick to understand that his role will not only be a passive one as Jesus’ student, but an active one, an apostolic one, of seeking and attracting other disciples to the Lord. And so Philip immediately finds Nathanael, one whose standout characteristic is transparency: “Here is truly an Israelite in whom there is no deceit,” Jesus says later about Nathanael.

This new student in Jesus’ class, Nathaniel, is the type of person who is honest enough to ask questions that the other students and even the teacher may not want to hear but need to hear, like, “Can anything good come out of Nazareth”? Nathaniel’s question does not faze Philip, who understands Nathanael’s quality of character and fitness to be a disciple and then an apostle. “Come and see,” Philip says to Nathanael. Come and be a disciple of this Jesus of Nazareth, “about whom Moses wrote in the law and also the prophets wrote.”

Nathanael, to his credit, takes up Philip’s invitation to be Jesus’ disciple. He starts, as Philip did, as Jesus’ disciple, at a “come and see” invitation, and Jesus transforms him, as he did Philip, into an apostle: “You will see greater things than these.” It is almost as though Jesus says to Nathaniel, “Not only will you see greater things than what you are experiencing now, but I will send you out to attract still more people to these greater things; to God; to eternal life.”

Jesus and Philip the Apostle extend to us the same invitation as they once did Nathanael: First, “come and see,” and then go, be sent out to attract still more disciples to Christ. Seek out and attract those who will, without deceit, ask a difficult but necessary question in today’s world: “What good can come out of the Church; out of being a Christian today”? And then may we be the good that attracts to Christ good people, disciples who will be formed by Christ through us into apostles; people who will “come and see” and then be sent out ourselves to serve the Lord.

Sunday, July 22, 2018

Homily for Sunday, 22 July 2018

Sunday of the 16th Week in Ordinary Time

Readings of the day: Jeremiah 23:1-6; Psalm 23:1-3, 3-4, 5, 6; Ephesians 2:13-18; Mark 6:30-34

This homily was given at St. Joseph's College, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 

Have we ever noticed how many Biblical passages are based on images of shepherding? These shepherding images may be easier to identify with in a culture like that of Israel, the Holy Land of Biblical times or of the present day, for that matter, than in a culture like ours, especially in a major city like Edmonton. When was the last time anybody here saw a shepherd or sheep? It has been a long time since I have seen a shepherd or sheep. And yet our Church dedicates one Sunday a year to a kind of celebration of shepherding, Good Shepherd Sunday, which coincides with the Fourth Sunday of Easter. Today, both our first reading, from the prophet Jeremiah, and our Psalm focus heavily on images of shepherding.

If we were to hear no more than our reading from Jeremiah today, and since the Church already celebrates a Good Shepherd Sunday, we might want to call today “Bad Shepherd Sunday.”

When I was in seminary, I took a practicum class on how to preside at Mass and other liturgical occasions like baptisms, weddings, and funerals. The textbook for the class, written in a humorous tone, especially considering the subject matter, by a Jesuit, Fr. Dennis Smolarski, was called How Not to Say Mass. The part of the Book of Jeremiah we hear today might as well have been called, “How Not to Shepherd,” although it would seem that Jeremiah was not in as humorous a mood in writing and preaching to the people of Israel of his time as Fr. Smolarski was in writing How Not to Say Mass.

Speaking through Jeremiah, God denounces the bad shepherds; the bad leaders of Israel of the time: “Woe to the shepherds who destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture”! But what made these shepherds so bad, and why, in our time, do we need a “Bad Shepherd Sunday”? How is Jeremiah’s denunciation of the leaders of Israel of his time relevant to us today?

Even if many of us may not identify as well as people of Biblical times with the shepherding metaphors found throughout the Bible, do we not still have some idea of what qualities a good leader would have, whether that leader is in government, a religious leader, an educator, a leader in the workplace, in society, in local community, or another kind of leader? Maybe we look to our leaders to unite our country; our society; our communities around common causes or a shared sense of what is just and right, socially if not also morally. A good leader leads by kindness, forthrightness, and gentleness, without losing anything of the strength of his or her leadership. In the words of St. Francis de Sales, “there is nothing so strong as gentleness and nothing so gentle as real strength.”

Do we not also have a sense of what characterizes a bad leader: One who divides a country; a society; a community; our world, and then plays on those divisions and the vulnerabilities of the people for personal or political gain? A bad leader can become so self-absorbed that this person no longer understands him or herself as a servant of a greater good, much less of our salvation but, at an extreme, as a kind of god distant and unyielding to the needs of the people he or she is leading.

Today we hear Jeremiah responding prophetically to precisely this kind of self-absorbed, self-righteous, self-deifying but ultimately false and bad leadership by the “shepherds who destroy and scatter,” whether in his time or in ours. Bad shepherding; self-absorbed leadership, Jeremiah and the other Biblical prophets say time and again, is a form of idolatry, of replacing the one true God with oneself or somebody or something else created as a god. For Jeremiah and the other Old Testament prophets, idolatry was the worst sin that could be committed. This is most critical to understanding the Old Testament prophets: They would never chastise the people or their leaders so harshly as we hear Jeremiah do today unless they were committing some form of idolatry, of making themselves equivalent to gods.

In contrast, a good and righteous leader; a godly leader; God himself always puts leadership at the service of unity; at the service of legitimate diversity and free will so that those the leader serves may grow as leaders themselves. For a good leader, leadership is never about them; it is not about me. Any leadership, especially in our Christian way of life, is about another and ultimately about God and leading one another in love toward God; toward salvation.

This is the kind of leader and leadership; the kind of shepherd and shepherding God, through Jeremiah, promises the people: “The days are surely coming… when I will raise up for David a righteous Branch, and he shall reign as king, and shall execute justice and righteousness in the land.”

As Christians, we believe that the shepherd, the righteous servant-leader of our salvation whom Jeremiah once promised has already lived among us as Jesus, the Christ. And we believe that Jesus Christ, the Good Shepherd, will return at the end of time to complete God’s work of our salvation. And yet there has never been a time when the LORD our God, the ultimate good shepherd, has not been with us in history. For God, shepherding has always been for our good. God’s shepherding us has always been, as our Psalm says, for the restoration of our soul. And so we may pray with confidence, even and perhaps especially in times of hardship, “in the presence of [our] enemies”: “The LORD is my shepherd, I shall not want.” Still, our God has chosen not to shepherd us alone and impersonally (although God could have done so), but to give us “shepherds after [his] own heart,” in another of Jeremiah’s great shepherding metaphors, to live among us and to lead us to God, to salvation. Can we not almost hear God saying about his way of shepherding, “It is not about me, but about my beloved people; my beloved created universe.” God has chosen to make each and every one of us, by virtue of our baptism, responsible for one another’s salvation. We are all the sheep of God’s flock, but also in a way all one another’s shepherds.

And so how are we to shepherd, to lead one another toward God; toward our salvation? History has constantly given us examples of good, godly servant-leader shepherds; of saints; of the strong yet gentle Christ-like figures most if not all of us have experienced. And yet history has also provided us many examples of how not to lead; of people for whom leadership is about them and less if at all about God. I am heartbroken whenever I hear of people in positions of power, especially in the Church (often, but not always, ordained people) who have become self-absorbed more than God-absorbed. Emotional, sexual, physical, or other abuse of vulnerable people; legal rigidity to the point where the law, whether of Church or state, becomes like a god and becomes abusive: These are the symptoms of idolatry, left in the wake of bad shepherds. “Woe to the shepherds who destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture,” says the LORD! And please allow me to beg forgiveness for the times when I, as an ordained leader of our Church, have put myself in the place of God; when I have failed to serve God’s people and our salvation; when I have sinned; when I have been a bad shepherd.

I, we all, our Church, and our world need from time to time the jarring reminder that Jeremiah and other prophets give us. We need this Bad Shepherd Sunday as much as we need a Good Shepherd Sunday in our Church. We need reminders like our readings give us today in order to lead one another more effectively to the salvation God promises us; in order to seek, reach out to, and welcome the people most vulnerable and most in need of God’s presence; those in need of rest; those in need of firm yet still gentle and kind guidance; those whom Mark’s Gospel describes for us today as “like sheep without a shepherd.” We need reminders like those we hear today to live up to the calling, the responsibility for one another’s salvation that we have received in baptism, to be shepherds; servants; leaders after the saints, and after God’s own heart.