Showing posts with label Pharisees. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pharisees. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 19, 2021

Homily for Tuesday, 19 January 2021– Ferial

Readings of the day: Hebrews 6:10-20; Psalm 111:1-2, 4-5, 9, 10c; Mark 2:23-28

Tuesday of the 2nd week in Ordinary Time

One of the many points of wisdom that my novice master has handed on to me since my novitiate year was to ask myself what my most absolute convictions are, especially on more contentious issues, and on which issues or personal or faith convictions I would allow a bit (or a lot) more leeway. And when I determine what my most absolute convictions are, I still need to exercise due charity toward other people who may not share the same absolute convictions that I do, culpably or not: Be prepared to listen; to ask questions aimed at a better mutual understanding of truth and not questions “baited” with my own agenda, and so on.

Could we not say that, in the Church as in the secular world, all truths, teachings, or convictions are not created equal, so to speak? In the Church, the truths we hold to be the most directly divinely revealed, those more absolute truths and convictions, we call dogmas or definitive doctrines. Only a small proportion of our Church’s teachings and convictions belong to this category of what is essential for our faith.

So, in today’s Gospel, what did the Pharisees consider to be the essential tenets or convictions of their faith? On the surface, the heart of their complaint against Jesus and his disciples seems to be their breach of the Sabbath law. After all, Jesus’ final retort to the Pharisees today is that “the Sabbath was made for people, not people for the Sabbath.” But if the Sabbath law were at the heart of the controversy in today’s Gospel, then why were the Pharisees conveniently on scene to complain about Jesus’ disciples making a path “through the grain fields [and plucking] heads of grain”? By some interpretations of Jewish Law at the time, the Pharisees would have been doing work, therefore violating the Sabbath themselves, by having walked far enough from home to notice Jesus’ disciples making a path through the grain fields.

The Gospel passage we hear today is nestled within a series of similar controversy events in Mark involving Jesus or his disciples versus the Pharisees, so something a bit more complex and probably sinister is happening in today’s Gospel than the Pharisees simply complaining that Jesus’ disciples were violating the Sabbath.

Once again, Mark shows the Pharisees going out of their way to bait Jesus into excusing his or his disciples’ violations of Jewish Law that to them were an inexcusable breach of their essential convictions. Maybe we could say that they were an inexcusable breach if somebody other than the Pharisees were doing the breaching! Anyway, their essential convictions do not correspond with Jesus’ most essential conviction that meeting basic human need—feeding the hungry, for example—is more important than laws governing the Sabbath.

Here again, we have what Vatican II would call “a hierarchy of truths”: What are our most absolute, essential convictions? To which rules, religious or civil, are we willing to make exceptions, for ourselves or other people, and why? How willing are we to exercise charity toward people (even when they are in error and our truth is worth defending) who do not share our most absolute convictions? Maybe the Pharisees; maybe everybody could benefit from a figure like my novice master to invite us to keep these questions in mind.

Saturday, September 1, 2018

Homily for Sunday, 2 September 2018

22nd Sunday in Ordinary Time

Readings of the day: Deuteronomy 4:1-2, 6-8; Psalm 15:2-3, 3-4, 4-5; James 1:17-18, 21b-22, 27; Mark 7:1-8, 14-15, 21-23

This homily was given at St. James and Our Lady of the Valley Churches, Vernon and Coldstream, BC, Canada. 

What do we make of the tensions in today’s readings between internal intentions and external actions; between observance of religious laws and traditions and what Jesus teaches is most important to God?

To some extent, I anticipate that most if not all of us have a high regard for laws, rules, and traditions, whether they are from God or from people; religious or secular. And there is nothing wrong with having a high regard for laws, rules, and traditions. In Canada, as in most or all developed countries at least, we speak of the “rule of law”—the Constitution and its Charter of Rights and Freedoms, civil and criminal law, precedent set by the rulings of several levels of courts of law—as a principle to govern our society. In the Book of Deuteronomy, Moses instills among the people of Israel a “rule of law” system. Israel is to be ruled by God’s laws, which will not be difficult for the people to discern and observe. God’s laws, Moses says to the people of Israel, are not to be seen as an imposition or a nuisance, but as a gift.

Other nations around Israel at the time worshipped several gods, and many worshipped their human rulers as gods. Many gods and human rulers as gods meant complicated systems of laws for the people to follow. What, then, does God propose through Moses to Israel’s people? If there is one God, then there is one simplified system of laws to communicate to Israel the nearness to it of its God; the care of God for Israel. And so God asks rhetorically through Moses: “For what other great nation has a god so near to it as the LORD our God is whenever we call to him? And what other great nation has statutes and ordinances as just as this entire law that I am setting before you today”? The point is that no other nation would enjoy such closeness to its God. No other nation would enjoy the gift of a rule of law so intelligible and just as Israel would enjoy. This law would be a perfect echo of God’s voice, caring for and sustaining our well-being on earth, so there would be no need to add to or take away from it.

There is nothing wrong with laws, rules, and traditions, as long as we do not allow these laws, rules, and traditions in themselves to become our gods. This is the point Jesus makes in the Gospel of Mark from which we hear today; in his dispute with the Pharisees and scribes who come from Jerusalem to investigate how well Jesus and his disciples observe the laws about food, laws about the ritual purification of dishes and vessels for food and drink and their bodies.

Neither Jesus nor Mark, the Gospel writer, simply dismiss this set of laws the Jews had inherited from Moses’ time as unimportant. In fact, in this part of Mark’s Gospel we get a sense that, very soon after Jesus’ ascension to heaven, the earliest Christian communities had to contend with both Jews, who knew and followed the law given them through Moses, and Greek and Roman pagans, who did not, joining them. This is most likely why Mark explains the long list of laws the Jews had about food preparation and washing the food, the vessels to prepare the food, and themselves. The first Christian leaders after Jesus decided immediately that, as Jesus had taught and lived among them, their communities would include everybody: Jews and pagans alike who had come to believe in Jesus. This would create some uneasy tensions among different groups of people, each with their laws, rules, and traditions.

These laws, rules, and traditions would remain important, though, and even constructive of Christian community as long as these laws, rules, and traditions did not become gods in themselves. These laws, rules, and traditions would be praiseworthy as long as they were observed as a gift that pointed the people to the one God, who cares for and sustains our life and well-being here on earth. Neither could religious or cultural laws, rules, and traditions become reduced to decrees we merely follow externally, while they fail to change our hearts and bring us closer to God.

This is at the heart of Jesus’ criticism of the Pharisees and scribes of his time, based on the words of the prophet Isaiah centuries before Jesus: “You hypocrites… ‘this people honours me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me.’” I offer this with a caveat that most Pharisees and other religious leaders of Jesus’ time followed with their hearts the sometimes-rigorous outward observance of religious law that they expected of themselves and everybody else. Mark’s Gospel today features a small group of Pharisees and scribes “from Jerusalem.” These were the self-proclaimed official police of observance of the Law of Moses, who thought themselves to be important because they had come from Jerusalem, the city at the centre of the Jewish faith. For them, the laws, rules, and traditions of faith were no longer a gift from God to point us back to God and to eternal life. They were no longer a sign of God’s care for us and for creation, but had been reduced to a means to power and prestige by this minority of religious leaders of Jesus’ time.

And when laws, rules, and traditions become inflexible, static means to power and prestige, how often does this show itself as self-righteous judgmentalism, in our own time as often as in the time of Jesus? If we appoint ourselves judges based on external observance of laws, rules, and traditions, we risk failing to discern accurately, as well as possible, the condition of the hearts of the faithful before God, which may or may not be well-reflected in external observance.

Yet how often do we hear, if we have not said ourselves, things like, “People who have committed or supported such-and-such an action should not receive communion? Those people come to Canada to take our jobs and change our culture and customs! How dare that person openly question that teaching; she or he is a heretic! That couple is ‘living in sin’”!

“This people honours me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me,” I imagine Jesus thinking of the people for whom laws, rules, and traditions become means to their own power and prestige instead of means toward patiently bringing external observances closer into line with the more universal longing of our hearts for God.

What, then, are the remedies for this self-righteousness; what we might call “Phariseeism”; for reducing laws, rules, and traditions, religious and otherwise, to means to power and prestige? First, I think it is important, as Jesus says in today’s Gospel, to recognize that evil (but also good) does not come from outside us; from external observances, no matter how faithful. Goodness or evil are conditions of the heart, of what is inside us. Second, as we hear in the Letter of James [the patron saint of this church], an important remedy to judging based on externals is to “be doers of the word, and not merely hearers who deceive” ourselves.

We become “doers of the word” when we are deeply aware of the condition of our own hearts; the presence within each of us of good and evil. We become “doers of the word” when our external observances are a sincere reflection of the condition of our hearts; when we expect of others only what we ourselves are capable; when we consider everybody as loved by God and called to eternal life; when we consider nobody as excluded from the eternal life God offers us.

We become “doers of the word,” and our hearts are drawn to the heart of God, when the law becomes not a means to power if not to an abuse of power; when laws, rules, and traditions are not gods in themselves but a gift from God to point us to eternal life.

Saturday, September 3, 2016

Homily for Saturday, 3 September 2016– Feast of St. Gregory the Great

Saturday of the 22nd Week in Ordinary Time

Readings of the day: 1 Corinthians 4:6b-15; Psalm 145:16-18, 19-20, 21; Luke 6:1-5

What is the purpose and meaning of the Sabbath? For the Pharisees of Jesus’ time and indeed for any faithful Jew, the Sabbath meant a day of rest from any and all work. This is why, in the Gospel reading we hear today, the Pharisees become angry at Jesus and his disciples for “picking… heads of grain” from the fields, “rubbing them in their hands, and eating them.” Jesus’ disciples had been doing work.

This concern among devout Jews about not working on the Sabbath day may seem foreign to our culture in which many people work and many workplaces and businesses are open on Sundays. But the Sabbath rest is not simply some practice of the distant past. I was reminded of this when I visited the Holy Land three years ago. In multi-storey buildings in Tel Aviv, where our pilgrimage stayed for a few nights, there are so-called “Sabbath elevators” that stop automatically on every floor. There is no need to push a button to stop the elevator on the desired floor; this would be considered doing work.

I am not trying to criticize either cultural practice: A more relaxed attitude toward work on Sundays here or the “Sabbath elevators” in the Holy Land. And yet, in our Gospel, Jesus calls us beyond the mere question of whether or not to work on the Sabbath, to question more deeply the motivation behind our actions. If we choose to keep the Sabbath day by not working this is well and good. If, as Christians,  we choose to go to Mass on Sundays as our way of keeping the Commandment to “keep holy the Sabbath day,” or not to shop on Sundays, or other practices, these, too, are excellent and to be encouraged.

But the purpose and meaning of our Sabbath; our worship once a week or more, is deeper than simply not working or gathering to worship one day a week. All our work and our worship, even on days that are not Sunday or the Sabbath, are to be oriented toward service to God by serving one another, especially people in any kind of need. Jesus is clear about this by his reminder to the Pharisees that King David once served the hungry people of Israel “the bread of offering” that “only the priests could lawfully eat” or even touch. Meeting human need is greater than slavishness to laws. The commandment to “keep holy the Sabbath Day” has an ethical component; it is meant to free us for service,  justice, and mercy toward one another, not simply to forbid us to work for one day each week.

Pope St. Gregory the Great,  whose feast we celebrate today, also reminds us of this greater purpose of the Sabbath day; of any human labor;  of our worship. In a homily, St. Gregory says that “when we attend to the needs of those in want, we give them what is theirs… We are performing a debt of justice.” And so our service; our works of justice and mercy;  our meeting of human need are the true meaning and purpose of the Sabbath day. Our service; our works of justice and mercy;  our meeting of human need ultimately point us toward God; toward “the Son of Man [who] is Lord of the Sabbath.”

Thursday, November 13, 2014

Homily for Thursday, 13 November 2014– Memorial of St. Frances Xavier Cabrini

Thursday of the 32nd Week in Ordinary Time

Readings of the day: Philemon 7-20; Psalm 146:7, 8-9a, 9 bc-10; Luke 17:20-25



Who among us has ever searched high and low for something that we have left in an obvious place, only not to be able to find it? After much wasted time and frustration, how many of us have reacted with annoyance at ourselves for not having found the object sooner? “It was right there in the open. How did I not see it?” we might ask ourselves.

This has happened to me on a few occasions. Perhaps we are searching for our keys; our wallets; our phones; pens and pencils; a book; our Bibles or missalettes… But what if we were searching for the Kingdom of God?

The Pharisees in today’s Gospel reading from Luke are searching for the Kingdom of God, but they cannot find it. Jesus says to the Pharisees, “The days will come when you will long to see one of the days of the Son of Man, but you will not see it.” And yet, before this, Jesus says to them, “Behold, the Kingdom of God is among you.”

The Pharisees search high and low, but they cannot find the Kingdom of God that is right out in the open, present before them and before us. Have any of us had a similar experience to theirs?

Jesus warns his disciples not to “run in pursuit” of those who say, “‘Look, there he is,’ or ‘Look, here he is.’”; there is the Kingdom of God. The Kingdom of God is here now. Do Jesus’ words of caution remind any of us of some evangelists on television who misquote or proof-text Scripture to induce fear in their hearers that the world could end anytime? We may be reminded of the stereotypical preacher on a street corner holding a sign, “The end is near”!

But there are more subtle ways in which we can miss the presence of the Kingdom of God among us here and now. Jesus ends our Gospel reading today with a startling reminder: “So will the Son of Man be in his day. But first he must suffer greatly and be rejected by this generation.”

Who are the people who “suffer greatly and [are] rejected by [our] generation”? Who are the people who share in the Passion; the Cross of Christ today; who are nevertheless signs to us of the Kingdom of God breaking through their suffering?

Today we celebrate the feast day of St. Frances Xavier Cabrini, the first naturalized American citizen to be canonized a saint. Mother Cabrini was an immigrant herself, from Italy. She educated, clothed, and sheltered orphans; the poor; immigrants of her time; people who had been “rejected by [her] generation” as Jesus was by his.

This nation has known Mother Cabrini’s example. Sadly, it still knows many poor; many immigrants and refugees who are not welcome; who suffer as Christ suffered for us; who are in a special way a sign of the Kingdom of God; the face of Christ to us. The Kingdom of God is here now before us, if we dare to search for it where it is, out in the open.

Thursday, July 17, 2014

Homily for Friday, 18 July 2014– Ferial

Friday of the 15th week in Ordinary Time

Optional Memorial of St. Camillus de Lellis


Readings of the day: Isaiah 38:1-6; Responsorial Canticle: Isaiah 38:10, 11, 12abcd, 16; Matthew 12:1-8


Have any of us ever acted in a way we knew was against a rule? Rules, laws, commandments, and guidelines are meant to establish and maintain social order. Ideally, in the case of our Church’s laws, they are meant to bring us closer to God. Laws or rules, then, are not meant to be broken without good reason. And yet, in the Gospel reading today, does not Jesus quite boldly condone his disciples’ breaking of the law not to work on the Sabbath? Clearly, the Pharisees take exception to Jesus’ permissive attitude toward his disciples’ picking of “heads of grain” and eating them on the Sabbath.

The Pharisees’ main responsibility during the time of Jesus was to defend and interpret the Jewish Law, the Law of Moses. Most Pharisees were just people. They were even considered to be a more liberal group of Jewish leaders than the priests who administered the Temple in Jerusalem. Here, though, some Pharisees criticize Jesus for allowing his disciples to break the Sabbath.

Jesus’ response to the Pharisees’ criticism is a humanitarian one: Are there not exceptions to the Sabbath in times of human need, such as hunger? The punch line of Jesus’ argument against the Pharisees is memorable: “The Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath.” When David “and his companions were hungry,” David broke the law against feeding themselves from “the bread of the offering” on the Sabbath. The priests of the Temple in Jesus’ time were routinely exempt by their service from the Sabbath rule against work.

Jesus breaks the rule against “unlawful” work on the Sabbath, but for good reason: Jesus himself is “Lord of the Sabbath.” Jesus’ reason for breaking this rule and allowing his disciples to do the same is not so much because he is God as because he is human. Jesus understands intimately what it means to be human; to experience the urgent need for food, both physical and spiritual. In this context of his intimate knowledge of human need; of his full humanity, Jesus shows us that urgent human need can be an exception to important rules, in this case that of the Sabbath fast from work.

Neither Jesus nor our Gospel reading condone disregard for laws, rules, or commandments, whether civil or of the Church. Rules are generally meant to be kept, although there are exceptions that we are occasionally called to discern thoughtfully and prayerfully. Will breaking a rule lead us and others closer or farther away from God (as is usually, but not always, the case)? Would breaking a rule, in exceptional cases, better satisfy an urgent human need than obeying it? Who or what rules over us: God or a rule or law? 

Laws like the Sabbath fast are meant to draw us to God. And yet these laws, we are reminded in today’s Gospel reading, are not gods. Jesus Christ, Son of Man and Son of God, “is Lord of the Sabbath.”